Coverage & QA — xwalk, orphans, price coverage
Pipeline-trust diagnostics for the public-data layer. Before we ship the opportunity set externally, these are the numbers that tell us how much to trust the plant universe, how cleanly we match ONS events to SIGA assets, and where price gaps distort R$ estimates. Anything tracked here is a leading indicator of external credibility — a single large-MW orphan in the wrong place embarrasses us on the first call.
Headline QA
tartana_asset_idXwalk tier distribution
ONS constrained-off events join the SIGA asset master through a plant xwalk. Tiers from best to worst: exact ceg match, canonical-name match, fuzzy, manual override. Everything outside the top tier is a candidate for manual review.
Plants by xwalk tier
Tier breakdown
Price coverage by month
Fraction of curtailed half-hours with a CMO price attached. Dips indicate bronze CMO gaps — typically month-boundary upload lag at ONS. A dashed line at 95% marks our operational bar.
SIGA-operating orphans — ≥ 3 MW EOL, no event match
Wind plants SIGA lists as operating and utility-scale but which never appear in the constrained-off feed, matched or otherwise. These are either (a) xwalk misses we should chase, (b) plants that genuinely never curtailed in the window, or (c) very recent commissioning dates. Review by plant size — large-MW orphans in curtailed submercados are the highest-value thing to investigate.
xwalk_manual override CSV.
dim_grupo_economico is a separate map). Both are expected — the point here is to know the public-data floor is clean.